Questionable Practices at Cal. DOH Could Put AIDS Patients at Risk

By Luis Alvarado

Abuse? Fraud? Negligence? Corruption? Bias? There really doesn't seem to be any other way to explain what is happening inside the California Department of Public Health's AIDS Drug Assistance Program (ADAP) when it recently decided to award a contract to an out-of-state company whose price tag of $9 million more than the next bidder, an Oakland based minority owned business that has been running this program for the past 19 years.

"We are concerned that the amount of time that has been allotted for system beta testing and enrollment worker training is not adequate. The Office of AIDS has notified us that the new system is still being developed, beta testing has not yet begun, and enrollment worker training will not begin until just weeks before the July 1st transition," said Access Support Network of San Luis Obispo and Monterey Counties, AIDS Project Los Angeles, Los Angeles LGBT Center, Project Inform, San Francisco AIDS Foundation and San Francisco Department of Public Health, in a letter to the California Department of Public Health.

"Further, the system is transitioning from one to three contractors which will require additional coordination to effectively serve clients," it continued. "In order to ensure a seamless transition, we believe additional time is necessary to adequately beta test the new system, train enrollment workers, and ensure adequate time for feedback on what is working properly and what needs to be improved."

Earlier this year, when the AIDS/HIV enrollment, insurance and pharmacy programs were put out to bid by the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), Ramsell submitted its bid as it has done for decades. But when Ramsell learned the bids were awarded to two out-of-state firms, it reviewed all the bids and noticed that CDPH staff had made significant errors when tabulating the points and pricing of the bids. Had these errors been corrected, Ramsell would have been the successful bidder.

When the CDPH was notified of the errors, they promptly invalidated the bids. But soon thereafter, they turned around and still awarded the contract to A.J. Boggs & Co. of Michigan, under the guise of ensuring "uninterrupted service."

Rightfully so, Ramsell has filed lawsuits in Sacramento County Superior Court over this questionable bid process.

Equally troubling are that the transition timeframe is July 1, and there are numerous community organizations serving our AIDS/HIV communities that that expressed grave concerns that there isn't enough of a transition period to ensure the new systems will work.

If in 45 days a Sacramento County Superior Court judge will issue a ruling on this case, it makes perfect sense for CDPH to extend the transition period for 45-60 days, so that if the existing contracts are found to be invalid, California's most vulnerable AIDS/HIV patients won't be without service, while a new RFP is issued.

Familias Unidas de California provides awareness and seeks to improve wellness in our Latino community, by focusing on issues of poverty, immigration reform, health care, and quality education.

To read the entire article, visit http://www.foxandhoundsdaily.com/2016/06/questionable-practices-ca-department-public-health-putting-states-vulnerable-aidshiv-patients-risk/